Äëÿ âñòóïëåíèÿ â îáùåñòâî íîâè÷êîâ è ïðîôåññèîíàëîâ äîìåí-èíäóñòðèè, ïîæàëóéñòà íàæìèòå çäåñü ...

   
 Êóïëÿ-ïðîäàæà è îáñóæäåíèå äîìåííûõ èì¸í
        

  
Âåðíóòüñÿ   Ôîðóì î äîìåíàõ > Ðûíî÷íûå ôîðóìû > Ïðîäàì/Kóïëþ ãîòîâûé ñàéò
Ðåíîìå Ïðàâèëà ôîðóìà Ñïðàâêà Ïîëüçîâàòåëè Âñå ðàçäåëû ïðî÷èòàíû
Ïðîäàì/Kóïëþ ãîòîâûé ñàéò
Ó Âàñ åñòü ãîòîâûé Âåá-Ñàéò, êîòîðûé Âû õîòåëè áû ïðîäàòü èëè æå Âû æåëàåòå ïðèîáðåñòè ãîòîâîå ðåøåíèå äëÿ Âàøåãî ïðîåêòà? Ðàçìåùàéòå Âàøè îáúÿâëåíèÿ â ýòîì ðàçäåëå.

 
 
Îïöèè òåìû
postgres timestamp vs timestamptz Ñåãîäíÿ
postgres timestamp vs timestamptz
îò 149ð çà .RU
Àðåíäà ñåðâåðà
2x Intel Hexa-Core Xeon E5-2420
Âñåãî 79 åâðî!

ñ âèäåîêàðòîé GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
âñåãî 99 åâðî!

îò 149ð çà .ÐÔ Ðåêëàìà íà DomenForum.net

Here’s the code that breaks production:

Let’s settle the debate: vs TIMESTAMPTZ (aka TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE ) .

Chances are, you chose the wrong PostgreSQL temporal data type.

CREATE TABLE events ( id serial PRIMARY KEY, naive_timestamp timestamp, aware_timestamp timestamptz );

For 95% of applications, TIMESTAMPTZ is the correct choice. Its primary advantage is .

If you change your session time zone to 'Asia/Tokyo' (UTC+9) and read the table:

There are only a few valid use cases for TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE :

Postgres Timestamp Vs Timestamptz

Here’s the code that breaks production:

Let’s settle the debate: vs TIMESTAMPTZ (aka TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE ) .

Chances are, you chose the wrong PostgreSQL temporal data type.

CREATE TABLE events ( id serial PRIMARY KEY, naive_timestamp timestamp, aware_timestamp timestamptz );

For 95% of applications, TIMESTAMPTZ is the correct choice. Its primary advantage is .

If you change your session time zone to 'Asia/Tokyo' (UTC+9) and read the table:

There are only a few valid use cases for TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE :




postgres timestamp vs timestamptz