Edward Westermarck hypothesized that individuals who are raised together during early childhood develop a sexual aversion to one another, an evolutionary mechanism to prevent inbreeding. In the context of the "always been close" trope, this effect is often used as a narrative foil. Because the characters are typically step-relations (not biologically related), the Westermarck effect is theoretically absent. The narrative exploits this loophole: the characters have the social appearance of a familial bond but lack the biological aversion mechanism. The "taboo" is thus entirely social, making the transgression a psychological game rather than a biological imperative.
This is the most psychologically complex element. "Always" suggests:
The "pure" indicates that the prohibition is a priori , not consequentialist. This creates a tragic structure: even loving, non-coercive closeness remains forbidden. always been close pure taboo
"Forbidden Bonds: Exploring the Complexity of Taboo Relationships"
By exploring the complexities of taboo relationships, we can gain a deeper understanding of human nature and the intricacies of human connection. Ultimately, it's essential to approach these relationships with empathy, understanding, and an open mind. The narrative exploits this loophole: the characters have
By corrupting the sanctuary of a trusted relationship, the genre provides a specific type of fantasy: one where intimacy is guaranteed by history, but excitement is generated by the violation of social boundaries. Ultimately, the popularity of this trope suggests a cultural fascination with the permeability of boundaries and the potential for the deepest platonic bonds to transform into something profoundly transgressive.
Intimacy on the Edge: A Psychological and Sociological Analysis of the "Always Been Close" Trope in Erotic Media "Always" suggests: The "pure" indicates that the prohibition
The paradox: their closeness is socially encouraged in childhood (shared bedroom, physical affection), but becomes illegal if sexualized in adulthood. The same proximity is reclassified from innocent to monstrous. This reveals that the taboo is not about the relationship's content but its symbolic category . The "always close" becomes the evidence of transgression: "You should have known better because you were so close."