Mandate — Eplan
For decades, industrial engineering suffered from a fragmented toolchain. Mechanical engineers used CAD (like SolidWorks or Inventor), electrical engineers used outdated schematic tools, and control programmers used PLC software. Data was transferred via static PDFs or spreadsheets.
As we kick off the engineering phase for [Project Name], I want to reiterate the company's recent mandate regarding electrical design software.
Support and training resources are available via the Engineering SharePoint. Non-compliance with this standard will result in project delays and will be addressed in performance reviews. Our goal is 100% compliance by [End Date]. eplan mandate
[Your Name]
This is not a new software feature or a government regulation. Instead, it refers to a growing strategic decision by multinational corporations and mid-sized OEMs to across their global supply chain. As we kick off the engineering phase for
To maintain our competitive edge and manage increasing project complexity, we are moving away from legacy 2D CAD methods. This transition is driven by three core business needs:
The ePlan Visualisation Enhancement Tool (VET) allows surveyors to convert the digital data into a formatted, professional PDF plan suitable for legal documentation and client use. 4. Datum Requirement Our goal is 100% compliance by [End Date]
Note: For up-to-date compliance, check the SPEAR ePlan FAQ page . Why Mandate ePlan? The Benefits
We propose a company-wide mandate to standardize engineering processes on the EPLAN platform. Currently, our fragmented use of legacy CAD tools results in a 20% redundancy rate in documentation and significant manual errors during panel building. An EPLAN mandate is not merely a software update; it is a shift toward a data-driven engineering culture.
Surveyors must use the standardized 74 cadastral layers in their CAD (DXF) files. Changing layer names will result in a failed validation. 2. Validation and Enrichment
